Made in Europe Association

Made in Europe Association

Together for Europe's technological sovereignty

Supporting European innovation on the global stage

Learn More
Best Service Provide

Best Service Provide

Fastest Way To Gain Business Success

We are experienced professionals who care about your success.

Learn More
Business Make Easy

Business Make Easy

We Serve the Best Work

We are experienced professionals who care about your success.

Learn More
Vision

Our Vision

Learn about our vision of a strong and technologically independent Europe. We believe that together we can build a digital reality based on openness, security and innovation.

Social media

Open and secure communication platforms

Read More

Cloud Services

Accessible and innovative European cloud

Read More

Office tools

Functional office software developed in Europe

Read More

Artificial intelligence

Development and use of AI based on European values

Read More

Get Involved

Do you have your own ideas? Are you a social media expert, have the codes in your little finger, have conducted hundreds of hours of training, or simply provide a friendly atmosphere? Become our volunteer!

+48 507 30 33 36

office@made-in-europe.pl

News

Our Blog

Here you will find information about the Association's activities and the most important events and trends in the European technology world.

Quo vadis, Europe?

For quite some time, we haven’t been particularly active on the internet and social media, but that doesn’t mean we’ve disappeared. We’ve been somewhat limited by personal matters, but there’s too much going on right now for us to remain silent.

In short: we are losing privacy in slow motion. It is slipping while we look away. And unfortunately, the EU is largely to blame for this.

In the EU a plan called “chat control” is back on the table. It would force services to scan private messages. That includes even messages protected by end-to-end encryption. Critics say this turns private chat into a screening line. The plan has moved forward again this summer under the Danish presidency. A vote is talked about for mid October. Poland is one of the very few countries which oppose these regulations.

Digital rights groups and many engineers warn that client side scanning breaks the very idea of secure messaging. The EU Parliament and Council already extended a temporary rule that lets platforms scan on a voluntary basis until April 2026. Turning that into a broad mandate would be a different world. Quite a dark one. All this with “child safety” on everyone’s lips.

You can feel the public mood online. Reddit is full of worried threads from r/europe and r/privacy to r/slovakia. People see this as mass scanning and as a blow to trust in tech. This is not fringe. It is a mainstream fear among users and creators.

At the same time Google is tightening control on Android. The company will start verifying the identity of developers who share apps outside the Play Store. It says this will fight scams and malware. Play Protect already scans installs from any source in real time. These moves raise the bar for independent app distribution. They also put more gatekeeping power in one place.

Both stories point in the same direction. More scanning. More identity checks. More control over what runs on our devices. Some of this has clear safety goals. The risk is that the baseline for private life keeps shrinking. Clearly, we don’t want to sound as if we’ve put on aluminium foil hats, but the line between smart defense and hard surveillance seems to blur fast.

What worries us most is how little space this gets in day to day talk. In news feeds this topic is virtually absent. On LinkedIn, the feed is dominated by AI (and sometimes HR threads). New models. New benchmarks. Little on encryption policy or platform power. These issues decide what kind of internet we live with and pass to our kids. They deserve plain talk from both non tech folks and specialists. No jargon. No spin.

Orwell wrote “1984” as a warning, not an instruction manual.

If you care about this, read from primary sources. Then speak up. Ask your teams about encryption. Ask your vendors about on-device scanning. Ask your leaders what safeguards they back. Contact your MEP.

If you work in tech or you simply use a phone, now is the time to pay attention.

Reading materials:

Bonus:

Controversies around “ProtectEU”

As we navigate the ever-evolving digital world, especially here in Europe, it’s crucial we stay informed. Have you heard about the EU’s new ‘ProtectEU’ strategy, announced by the European Commission? It’s making waves, and frankly, as of May 6, 2025, some of its proposals have us at the Made in Europe Association quite concerned.

So, what’s ProtectEU all about? On the surface, it’s a comprehensive plan for the 2024-2029 period, aiming to bolster the EU’s internal security against a range of threats, from organised crime to cyberattacks. A key, and rather controversial, component is its plan to prepare a “Technology Roadmap on encryption”. The stated goal? To identify and assess technological solutions that would allow law enforcement authorities to access encrypted data – think your private messages or secure files – in a “lawful manner,” all while supposedly “safeguarding cybersecurity and fundamental rights”. For those less familiar, ‘end-to-end encryption’ is the technology that keeps your digital conversations truly private, ensuring only you and the person you’re communicating with can read them; not even the service provider can get a look in.

The Big Concern: Weakening Encryption

Now, why the alarm bells from so many quarters? This idea of “lawful access” often translates into proposals for measures that could fundamentally weaken encryption. We’re talking about things like ‘backdoors’ – essentially secret keys that bypass security – or ‘client-side scanning,’ where your messages could be scanned for certain content on your device before they even get encrypted and sent. Sounds a bit intrusive, doesn’t it?

Well, a significant number of civil society organizations, academics, technologists, and human rights advocates certainly think so. They argue, and we at the Made in Europe Association agree, that attempting to create ‘safe’ backdoors or ‘privacy-preserving’ client-side scanning is technically unfeasible. Experts have long warned that any system designed to bypass encryption inherently creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited by anyone – not just the intended ‘good guys,’ but also cybercriminals and even hostile state actors, posing severe risks to everyone’s digital safety. Indeed, the European Court of Human Rights has explicitly stated that introducing backdoors to weaken encryption could enable widespread surveillance and be exploited by criminal networks, deeming such a risk disproportionate.

Why This Matters for Europe (and You!)

In these times of considerable geopolitical uncertainty, including the shifting sands of US politics and ongoing global economic competition, strengthening Europe’s digital sovereignty is more critical than ever. We need robust, secure digital infrastructure, ideally built and championed by European innovators. Initiatives that propose weakening encryption, however, could achieve the precise opposite. They risk not only compromising individual privacy but also making our entire digital ecosystem more vulnerable, undermining trust in European technology at a time when we need to bolster it. How can we aim for genuine digital leadership if the very tools that ensure our online security and data privacy are deliberately compromised?

The Open Letter Against ProtectEU’s Encryption Plans

This isn’t just an isolated concern. Tuta, a European secure email provider, recently highlighted an open letter on their blog, addressed to Ms. Henna Virkkunen, the EU’s Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy. This letter is signed by an impressive coalition of civil society organizations, scientists, researchers, and other experts specializing in human rights and technology.

Key points from the open letter include:

  • Threat to fundamental rights & security: The plan for a Technology Roadmap on encryption to enable law enforcement access to encrypted data is seen as a significant risk.
  • Technically impossible to do safely: There’s a wide scientific consensus that providing ‘exceptional access’ without creating vulnerabilities exploitable by malicious actors and authoritarian regimes is not possible.
  • Flawed solutions: Proposals like client-side scanning are not truly privacy-preserving; they can enable bulk surveillance and increase the risk of security breaches.
  • Encryption must be strong: The letter emphasizes that strong, end-to-end encryption is crucial for safeguarding human rights and ensuring a secure digital infrastructure across Europe.
    The signatories also call for meaningful participation in the development of this Technology Roadmap, requesting seats at the table for independent experts to ensure solutions are evidence-based and respectful of fundamental rights.

Our Stance and A Call to You

Here at the Made in Europe Association, we stand firmly with these critics. We believe that strong encryption is a cornerstone of a secure, free, and innovative digital Europe. Efforts to undermine it, even with the stated aim of lawful access, are technically fraught and could have far-reaching negative consequences for our continent’s digital security infrastructure and our citizens’ fundamental rights. In an era where digital threats are escalating and Europe’s digital autonomy is paramount, pursuing policies that weaken our defences seems counterproductive.

We strongly encourage you to delve deeper. You can find the full open letter and Tuta’s insightful analysis on their blog here. Educate yourselves on the implications.

What are your thoughts on this delicate balance between security and privacy? How should Europe navigate these challenges to protect both its citizens and its digital future? We’d love to hear your views in the comments below.

Redirecting Europe’s digital conversations: Why it’s time to embrace homegrown messaging apps

Have you ever wondered who really owns your private conversations? For years, most of us in Europe have relied on American giants like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger to keep in touch with friends, family, and colleagues. These platforms promise “free” services, but the real price is often our privacy—our messages, contacts, and even our metadata stored on servers far beyond European borders, governed by laws and policies as unpredictable as the current US administration. In an era of global uncertainty and digital sales wars, is it wise to keep entrusting our most personal data to companies whose allegiances and priorities may shift overnight?

At the Made in Europe Association, we believe it’s time for a change. Europe is home to a vibrant ecosystem of messaging apps that not only comply with our own stringent privacy laws but often surpass their American counterparts in transparency, security, and user empowerment. For too long, we’ve paid for “free” apps with our data. Now, let’s explore the European alternatives that put users—not advertisers or foreign interests—at the center.

Threema: Swiss Privacy, No Compromises

Threema, developed in Switzerland, is the gold standard for privacy-first messaging in Europe. What sets Threema apart is its “Privacy by Design” philosophy: the app generates as little metadata as technically possible, and messages are deleted from servers immediately after delivery. You can use Threema completely anonymously—no phone number or email required; instead, you get a randomly generated Threema ID. The service is fully open source, with code and security audits available for public scrutiny, and all servers are hosted in Switzerland, ensuring your data remains protected by some of the world’s strongest privacy laws. Threema’s end-to-end encryption covers all communications, including group chats, calls, and even profile pictures. The app is available across iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it as versatile as it is secure. There is a one-time fee of 5 EUR, which supports the company’s independence from advertising and data sales. As an association, we recommend Threema most highly—not just for its technical excellence, but for its unwavering commitment to user rights, transparency, and European values. In a world where privacy is under siege, a small upfront cost is a wise investment in your long-term digital security.

Skred: French Peer-to-Peer Privacy

Skred, hailing from France, offers a unique peer-to-peer approach to private messaging. Unlike most apps, Skred doesn’t require a phone number or email for registration, instead using QR codes for contact exchange. This means your identity remains truly private, with only a minimal account token stored. All exchanges are end-to-end encrypted and the app does not store any messages or metadata on central servers, further reducing privacy risks. Skred’s encryption draws on the expertise of the Guardian Project, and the app undergoes regular security audits by Quarkslab. Features include self-destructing messages, secure file sharing, group chats, and the ability to create multiple identities for different contexts. Skred is free to use and available on iOS, Android, and desktop, making it accessible to a wide audience. Its only notable drawback is that it’s not yet fully open source, but its strong audit record and privacy-first design make it a top recommendation for those who value anonymity and security.

Element: Decentralized, Transparent, and Open

Element, formerly Riot.im, is a UK-born messaging platform built on the Matrix protocol, which champions decentralization and interoperability. Every line of Element’s code is open source and available on GitHub, allowing governments, organizations, and independent experts to audit its security. Element’s decentralized architecture means users or organizations can host their own servers, ensuring complete data ownership and sovereignty. End-to-end encryption is standard for one-on-one and group chats, and the app integrates with Jitsi for secure video conferencing. Element is available across desktop and mobile platforms, but its interface and decentralized nature may present a learning curve for some users. Despite that, its commitment to openness, robust encryption, and user control make it a standout choice for privacy-conscious individuals and organizations.

Wire: Swiss Security with a Modern Touch

Wire, another Swiss entry, is fully open source and has undergone several independent security audits to address early concerns. Communications—messages, files, and calls—are end-to-end encrypted by default, using the Proteus protocol, which is an early iteration of the widely respected Signal protocol. Each message is encrypted with new keys that rotate regularly, ensuring strong forward secrecy. Wire is available for free for personal use and offers paid plans for businesses. While it does collect some metadata (notably for syncing across devices), this is a trade-off for cross-platform convenience. The company’s servers are located in Germany and Ireland, with ISO 27001 certification and regular audits. Wire is a solid choice for users seeking a balance between usability and privacy, but those with the highest privacy demands should consider whether metadata collection aligns with their threat model.

Olvid: French Innovation with Certified Security

Olvid, from France, is a trailblazer in cryptographic innovation. Its client-side code is open source, and its cryptographic protocols have been independently validated by leading experts. Olvid does not require a phone number or email; instead, contact exchange happens via QR codes when users are nearby, and there is no central user directory—reducing the risk of unsolicited messages and large-scale attacks. Uniquely, Olvid encrypts not just message content but also metadata, guaranteeing the anonymity of correspondents. The app has received Security Visas (CSPN certification) from the French cybersecurity agency ANSSI, a rare mark of trust. While video calling requires a paid subscription, Olvid’s uncompromising privacy and formal certifications make it ideal for those who demand the highest standards.

Delta Chat: Messaging Meets Email

Delta Chat, developed in Germany, takes a novel approach by using your existing email account as the backbone for messaging. There’s no need to register or create a new account—just use your current email. After the initial message, all communications are automatically end-to-end encrypted using the Autocrypt standard. Delta Chat is fully open source, decentralized, and works across multiple devices and platforms. Its reliance on the global email infrastructure means you can message anyone with an email address, even if they don’t use Delta Chat. While the experience can vary depending on your email provider and setup, Delta Chat’s flexibility and independence from proprietary servers make it a compelling option for those who value openness and interoperability.

Treebal: Messaging with a Green Heart

Treebal, from France, is the first ethical and eco-responsible messaging app, blending privacy with environmental stewardship. All communications are end-to-end encrypted, and messages are automatically deleted after seven days to minimize data storage and carbon footprint. Treebal is committed to eco-design, measuring and minimizing its environmental impact, and redistributes up to half of its revenue to environmental projects. The app is not fully open source and relies on Google Cloud servers in Brussels, which is a significant privacy drawback. However, Treebal’s mission-driven approach and collaboration with cybersecurity agencies for certification make it a unique option for users who prioritize both privacy and sustainability.

Ginlo / Ginlo2: Good Intentions, Questionable Execution

Ginlo, from Germany, claims strong encryption and privacy, but its partially open-source code lacks documentation and independent audits. The app uses AES-256-CBC and RSA-2048 encryption, but security researchers have identified several protocol weaknesses, such as outdated encryption methods and insecure key generation. Without comprehensive third-party validation, we cannot recommend Ginlo for users who prioritize robust, transparent security.

Session: Open Source, But with Caveats

Session, now based in Switzerland (formerly Australia), is a fully open-source messenger that operates without phone numbers or emails, using randomly generated Session IDs. It leverages a decentralized network of thousands of community-operated nodes, making it resistant to censorship and surveillance. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and routed through an onion network, masking sender and receiver IP addresses. However, Session’s decision to disable Perfect Forward Secrecy—a feature that ensures past messages remain secure even if keys are compromised—has drawn criticism.While its cryptography has been independently audited, and metadata collection is minimized, some concerns remain about its technical choices and association with cryptocurrency incentives. Session is innovative, but we refrain from a firm recommendation at this time.

TeleGuard: Promising, But Needs More Transparency

TeleGuard, another Swiss contender, claims strong encryption using the Salsa20 algorithm and a minimalist approach to data collection. However, the lack of a publicly available code repository or independent audits makes it difficult to fully assess its security. While the app appears safe and is funded by donations, we recommend waiting for greater transparency before trusting it with sensitive communications.

Briar: For Activists and High-Risk Users

Briar, developed in Austria, is designed for activists, journalists, and anyone needing extreme privacy. It uses a peer-to-peer protocol that syncs messages over Tor, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or even memory cards, allowing for secure communication even when the internet is down or unreliable. Briar does not rely on any central server, making it highly resistant to censorship and surveillance. All messages are stored securely on your device, and the app is fully open source. While not intended for everyday use, Briar is invaluable for those operating in high-risk environments or under oppressive regimes.

Teamwire: Enterprise-Grade Security for Business

Teamwire, from Germany, is tailored for businesses and organizations that require strict compliance with EU data protection laws. It employs advanced encryption for messages and metadata, holds ISO 27001 certification, and stores all data in certified German data centers. Teamwire integrates with leading enterprise mobility management solutions and offers features like audit-proof archiving and professional audit logs. While not fully open source, its focus on compliance and security makes it a strong choice for regulated industries, though it’s not intended for individual users.

Honorary Mention: Signal

Although not a European application, Signal deserves special recognition as it sets the global standard for secure communication. Launched in July 2014 by Moxie Marlinspike, Signal is developed by the non-profit Signal Foundation and its subsidiary, Signal Messenger LLC. The foundation was established in 2018 with $50 million in initial funding from WhatsApp co-founder Brian Acton, who now serves as Signal’s CEO. Despite being based in the United States, Signal’s source code is fully open, and the app has been approved for internal use by EU institutions, prompting us to include it in this overview.

At the heart of the application lies the Signal Protocol – an acclaimed cryptographic standard providing end-to-end encryption (E2EE) for text messages, voice messages, and video calls so robust that it’s used by WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Google’s messaging products. The app was designed with global privacy standards in mind; its minimal data retention makes it highly resilient to law enforcement requests and government surveillance. The source code for the mobile clients, desktop application, and most server components is available on GitHub under the AGPL-3.0 license. This transparency allows independent experts to review, audit, and contribute to the codebase. The Signal Protocol has undergone numerous independent security audits, including a formal review by researchers from the University of Oxford and other institutions, which confirmed its resilience against attacks and the absence of major flaws. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) also rates Signal highly for security and privacy.

In summary, Signal stands out as a transparent, independently audited, and highly secure communication platform that has set industry standards. Although not a European solution, its reputation and security level are undeniable. Nevertheless, as the Made in Europe Association, we wish to emphasize that equally secure European alternatives exist, such as Threema, Skred, or Element, and it is their use that we primarily recommend to users both within and outside Europe.

Conclusion: Choose European, choose privacy

The dominance of US-based messaging apps is neither inevitable nor irreversible. Europe boasts a wealth of alternatives that respect our laws, values, and right to privacy. Whether you prioritize transparency, open source, independence, or even environmental sustainability, there’s a European messaging app tailored to your needs.

So, what’s stopping you from making the switch? Download one of these apps, invite your friends and family, and help us reclaim our digital sovereignty. Your conversations—and your data—deserve to stay in Europe.

Let’s start the conversation. Which European messaging app will you try first? Share your thoughts with us and join the movement for a more private, secure, and independent digital future.